000 02796nam a22004218i 4500
001 CR9781316227305
005 20250930143536.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr||||||||||||
008 141020s2017||||enk o ||1 0|eng|d
020 _a9781316227305 (ebook)
020 _z9781107106949 (hardback)
020 _z9781107514515 (paperback)
040 _aUkCbUP
_beng
_erda
_cUkCbUP
050 4 _aJZ5665
_b.S43 2017
082 0 4 _a327.1/747
_223
100 1 _aSechser, Todd S.,
_eauthor.
245 1 0 _aNuclear weapons and coercive diplomacy /
_cTodd S. Sechser, Matthew Fuhrmann.
264 1 _aCambridge :
_bCambridge University Press,
_c2017.
300 _a1 online resource (344 pages) :
_bdigital, PDF file(s).
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
500 _aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 28 Feb 2017).
505 0 _aNuclear blackmail in international politics -- Nuclear coercion and nuclear skepticism -- Standoffs: nuclear weapons in crisis bargaining -- Stalemates: territorial disputes and nuclear politics -- Brinkmanship busts: when nuclear coercion fails -- Think again: reassessing nuclear victories -- Nuclear coercion in myth and reality.
520 _aAre nuclear weapons useful for coercive diplomacy? Since 1945, most strategic thinking about nuclear weapons has focused on deterrence - using nuclear threats to prevent attacks against the nation's territory and interests. But an often overlooked question is whether nuclear threats can also coerce adversaries to relinquish possessions or change their behavior. Can nuclear weapons be used to blackmail other countries? The prevailing wisdom is that nuclear weapons are useful for coercion, but this book shows that this view is badly misguided. Nuclear weapons are useful mainly for deterrence and self-defense, not for coercion. The authors evaluate the role of nuclear weapons in several foreign policy contexts and present a trove of new quantitative and historical evidence that nuclear weapons do not help countries achieve better results in coercive diplomacy. The evidence is clear: the benefits of possessing nuclear weapons are almost exclusively defensive, not offensive.
650 0 _aNuclear arms control.
650 0 _aNuclear nonproliferation.
650 0 _aDiplomacy.
650 0 _aInternational relations.
_960057
700 1 _aFuhrmann, Matthew,
_d1980-
_eauthor.
776 0 8 _iPrint version:
_z9781107106949
856 4 0 _uhttps://eresourcesptsl.ukm.remotexs.co/user/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316227305
907 _a.b16844981
_b2022-10-31
_c2020-12-22
942 _n0
998 _a1
_b2020-12-22
_cm
_da
_feng
_genk
_y0
_z.b16844981
999 _c651841
_d651841