000			03236nam a22004458i 4500
001			CR9781316584620
005			20250919141954.0
006			m|||||o||d||||||||
007			cr||||||||||||
008			150918s2019||||enk o ||1 0|eng|d
020			_a9781316584620 (ebook)
020			_z9781107150829 (hardback)
020			_z9781316605455 (paperback)
040			_aUkCbUP _beng _erda _cUkCbUP
043			_aa-is---
050	0	0	_aBM538.S7 _bS27 2019
082	0	0	_a322/.1095694 _223
100	1		_aSapir, Gideon, _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aState and religion in Israel : _ba philosophical-legal inquiry / _cGideon Sapir, Daniel Statman.
264		1	_aCambridge : _bCambridge University Press, _c2019.
300			_a1 online resource (x, 310 pages) : _bdigital, PDF file(s).
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
500			_aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 04 Jan 2019).
505	0		_aPart 1: Theory -- 1. Liberalism and neutrality (1): Arguments against support -- 2. Liberalism and neutrality (2): Arguments against preference -- 3. The assumed dangers of religion -- 4. Religious reasons for separation -- 5. Freedom of religion -- 6. Protection of religious feelings -- 7. Freedom from religion -- 8. Religious coercion: the place of religious arguments in the public sphere -- Part 2: From theory to practice -- 9. Marriage and divorce -- 10. Religious education -- 11. Serving religious needs -- 12. Drafting yeshiva students into the army -- 13. The Sabbath in a Jewish State -- 14. The supreme court on the protection of and from religion -- 15. Minority religions in Israel.
520			_aState and Religion in Israel begins with a philosophical analysis of the two main questions regarding the role of religion in liberal states: should such states institute a'Wall of Separation' between state and religion? Should they offer religious practices and religious communities special protection? Gideon Sapir and Daniel Statman argue that liberalism in not committed to Separation, but is committed to granting religion a unique protection, albeit a narrower one than often assumed. They then use Israel as a case study for their conclusions. Although Israel is defined as a Jewish state, its Jewish identity need not be interpreted religiously, requiring that it subjects itself to the dictates of Jewish law (Halakha). The authors test this view by critically examining important topics relevant to state and religion in Israel: marriage and divorce, the drafting of yeshiva students into the army, the character of the Sabbath and more.
650		0	_aJudaism and state _zIsrael _xPhilosophy.
650		0	_aReligion and state _zIsrael _xPhilosophy.
650		0	_aDemocracy _xReligious aspects _xJudaism.
651		0	_aIsrael _xPolitics and government.
650		0	_aJewish philosophy _zIsrael _xHistory _y21st century.
700	1		_aStatman, Daniel, _eauthor.
776	0	8	_iPrint version: _z9781107150829
856	4	0	_uhttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781316584620
907			_a.b16834914 _b2020-12-22 _c2020-09-28
942			_n0
998			_a1 _b2020-12-22 _cm _da _feng _genk _y0 _z.b16834914
999			_c650856 _d650856