000			02728cam a2200373 i 4500
005			20250919001732.0
008			141127t2012 xxk b 001 0 eng
020			_a9781107008427 (hardback)
020			_a1107008425 (hardback)
039		9	_a201411271258 _badnan _c201411271256 _dadnan _y11-27-2014 _zadnan
040			_aDLC _beng _cDLC _dYDX _dBTCTA _dUKMGB _dYDXCP _dBWX _dDLC _dUKM _erda
090			_aC65.36.A534 2
090			_aC65.36 _b.A534 2
100	1		_aAnderson, Owen J., _eauthor.
245	1	4	_aThe natural moral law : _bthe good after modernity / _cOwen Anderson.
264		1	_aCambridge : _bCambridge University Press, _c2012.
264		4	_c©2012
300			_axiii, 305 pages ; _c24 cm.
336			_atext _2rdacontent
337			_aunmediated _2rdamedia
338			_avolume _2rdacarrier
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505	8		_aMachine generated contents note: 1. The postmodern challenge: from modernity to postmodernity; 2. Traditional natural law: differences in Aristotle and Aquinas; 3. Patterns in historical thinking about the good; 4. The challenge of modernity: religious wars and the need for universal law; 5. The challenges of naturalism: legal realism or natural law; 6. Objectivity without a metaphysical foundation; 7. Contemporary natural law: practical rationality and legal opinions; 8. Natural law as a theory with metaphysical baggage: postmodern law; 9. Natural law as the moral law; 10. Natural moral law in a postmodern world.
520			_a'The Natural Moral Law argues that the good can be known and that therefore the moral law, which serves as a basis for human choice, can be understood. Proceeding historically through ancient, modern and postmodern thinkers, Owen Anderson studies beliefs about the good and how it is known, and how such beliefs shape claims about the moral law. The focal challenge is whether the skepticism of postmodern thinkers can be answered in a way that preserves knowledge claims about the good. Considering the failures of modern thinkers to correctly articulate reason and the good and how postmodern thinkers are responding to these failures, Anderson argues that there are identifiable patterns of thinking about what is good, some of which lead to false dichotomies. The book concludes with a consideration of how a moral law might look if the good is correctly identified'-- _cProvided by publisher.
650		0	_aNatural law.
650		0	_aLaw and ethics.
907			_a.b16035744 _b2019-11-12 _c2019-11-12
942			_c01 _n0 _kC65.36.A534 2
914			_avtls003574415
990			_amab
991			_aFakulti Undang-Undang
998			_au _b2014-01-11 _cm _da _feng _gxxk _y0 _z.b16035744
999			_c582793 _d582793